Judicial decisions12/8/2023 ![]() In Experiment 2, we used a telecommunication swindle, and the results showed that facial trustworthiness significantly predicted punishment magnitude and sentence decisions. Additionally, this “beauty-penalty effect” was merely observed in the untrustworthy condition. Specifically, female participants were more likely to issue a guilty verdict to better-looking male defendants. In Experiment 1, we used a blind-date swindle and found a “beauty penalty” for physically attractive defendants among females. A total of six hundred and sixty-three participants across two studies were asked to make conviction-related judgments and penalty-related decisions for the defendants after they were randomly assigned to one of the four categories of faces. We selected the following four categories of faces by manipulating facial attractiveness and trustworthiness simultaneously: the attractive and trustworthy face the attractive but untrustworthy face the unattractive but trustworthy face and the unattractive and untrustworthy face. The present study aimed to examine the effects of male defendants’ facial appearance (attractiveness and trustworthiness) on judicial decisions in two different swindles. 4Duke-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. ![]() ![]() 3Department of Psychology, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou, China.2Mental Health Center, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.1Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.Qun Yang 1*† Bing Zhu 1† Qian Zhang 1 Yuchao Wang 1 Ruiheng Hu 2 Shengmin Liu 3 Delin Sun 4 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |